Žiadny popis

Conor McDermottroe 1ab066c718 Add a test to discourage people from implementing support for __call. 14 rokov pred
bin 236ba060ca Code style updates. 14 rokov pred
examples 81d764580c Fix undefined `self` in the i18n example. 14 rokov pred
test 1ab066c718 Add a test to discourage people from implementing support for __call. 14 rokov pred
.gitmodules 596fb3c1d4 Adding test support for the mustache spec. 15 rokov pred
LICENSE 36bd2d87dc MIT License 15 rokov pred
Mustache.php 1764e6270b Version bump (0.9.0) 14 rokov pred
MustacheLoader.php 2aaa820965 Add a 'MustacheLoader' filesystem loader. 14 rokov pred
README.markdown 69cce225e1 Incorrect variable name in example 14 rokov pred

README.markdown

Mustache.php

A Mustache implementation in PHP.

Usage

A quick example:

<?php
include('Mustache.php');
$m = new Mustache;
echo $m->render('Hello {{planet}}', array('planet' => 'World!'));
// "Hello World!"
?>

And a more in-depth example--this is the canonical Mustache template:

Hello {{name}}
You have just won ${{value}}!
{{#in_ca}}
Well, ${{taxed_value}}, after taxes.
{{/in_ca}}

Along with the associated Mustache class:

<?php
class Chris extends Mustache {
    public $name = "Chris";
    public $value = 10000;

    public function taxed_value() {
        return $this->value - ($this->value * 0.4);
    }

    public $in_ca = true;
}

Render it like so:

<?php
$chris = new Chris;
echo $chris->render($template);
?>

Here's the same thing, a different way:

Create a view object--which could also be an associative array, but those don't do functions quite as well:

<?php
class Chris {
    public $name = "Chris";
    public $value = 10000;

    public function taxed_value() {
        return $this->value - ($this->value * 0.4);
    }

    public $in_ca = true;
}
?>

And render it:

<?php
$chris = new Chris;
$m = new Mustache;
echo $m->render($template, $chris);
?>

Known Issues

  • As of Mustache spec v1.1.2, there are a couple of whitespace bugs around section tags... Despite these failing tests, this version is actually closer to correct than previous releases.

See Also